arts policy SPW Art | ART-ACT Art | Introduction | Art Contest | Web School | Free Graphics
Web Lessons | Lakefront Artists Market | Artists Links | Artists Resources | Help Us

Support inner-city artists - buy t-shirt art


art policy debate

The "Chicago Cultural Plan" Did not Die With Harold
Chicago Cultural Plan in PDF formate to print and read off-line

E-Mail us with your opinions!

We need your opinions, analysis and additional suggestions. Which suggestions has the city acted on? Which have been ignored? What new ideas can you add to these? How can we move Chicago toward cultural excellence for ALL OUR COMMUNITIES? How can we establish "cultural democracy" in Chicago?

RESPOND TO umcac@art-teez.org

INDEX of the Chicago Cultural Plan

Click on any underlined topic in this index to go there. Click on the Return to Index to return here. This is on one page so you can copy the entire document at once. This Plan has been lost, but now it is found. Write. Your thoughts can improve the cultural life of Chicago. We will publish all coherent responses here.

The "Chicago Cultural Plan's WRITTEN STATEMENTS

A) A Tribute to Chicago Culture by Harold Washington
B) A Statement of Principles
C) A New Beginning by Fred Fine
D) Notes on Contributions by Michael C. Dorf
E) Implementation
F) Summary - A Cultural Plan for the People of Chicago: The Grassroots Campaign

THE PLAN

1) Cultural Policy in City Government
Department of Cultural Affairs - Recommendations
Tourism - Recommendations
Economic Development - Recommendations
The Park District - Recommendations
Public Art - Recommendations

2) City Wide Communication and Cooperation
Communication About Programs and Resources - Recommendations
Public Access to Cultural Programming - Recommendations
Community Arts Councils and Cultural Planning - Recommendations

3) Facilities
Living and Work Space for Artists and Arts Organization - Recommendations
Community Cultural Centers - Recommendations
Center City and Major Institutions - Recommendations
The Cultural Center - Recommendations

4) Technical and Financial Resources
Funding for Individual Artists and Cultural Organizations - Recommendations
Technical and Materials Resource Centers - Recommendations
Administrative Training and Services for Cultural Organizations and Individuals - Recommendations

5) Arts and Education
Elementary and Secondary Education - Recommendations
Continuing and Adult Education - Recommendations

6) Paying for the Plan
Revenue Options


7) List of Comments by Public
Once this list grows we will begin to organize them with the sections they refer to. Empty for now - please write.

8) List of New Suggestions from Public
We encourage discussion and debate on the merits of each new suggestion and will form pages linked to each suggestion as we receive responses to them. Interested in the opinions of the Department of Cultural Affairs when they revisited the Plan ten years later? Look between the lines for a community art administrators insights on Department of Cultural Revisits the Chicago Cultural Plan 1995.



CHICAGO CULTURAL PLAN

The Chicago Cultural Plan was funded by a grant from the Chicago Community Trust with additional funding from the National Endowment for the Arts.


A TRIBUTE TO CHICAGO CULTURE

Over 150 years, Chicago has evolved from a small prairie city to a dynamic cultural center of international status. Therefore, it is fitting that we celebrate Chicago's Sesquicentennial by presenting the city with its first comprehensive, cohesive strategy for nurturing our artistic and cultural resources.

Chicago is alive with culture. Every corner of the city is literally bursting with cultural and artistic activity - with neighborhood dance troupes and community theater, jazz and blues musicians and symphony orchestras, sculptors, painters and writers - all contributing to the great excitement and ethnic diversity that makes Chicago so remarkable.

But culture is a precious resource that requires careful attention. It is an integral part of Chicago's spirit and an underpinning of Chicago's economic well-being. Yet this city has never before developed a long-range, coordinated plan for culture and the arts. Now, thanks to the work of so many dedicated Chicagoans, we have one.

I commend the diligence and vision of those who pursued the development of the plan, in particular Commissioner Fred Fine, Advisory Board Chair Jessie Woods, Planning Committee Chair Robert Hutchins and Director of the Plan Michael C. Dorf.

I especially salute the thousands of Chicagoans and hundreds of organizations that contributed their time and ideas to the development of this plan.

With the Chicago Cultural Plan, we pay tribute to the cultural greatness of Chicago and pledge to enhance and showcase that greatness for generations to come.
Return to Index

by Harold Washington, Mayor

A Statement of Principles

The individual artist is at the foundation of our cultural heritage. The ability of artists to pursue the arts as a career and earn a living wage is basic to the growth and stability of our cultural diversity.

Thousands of cultural organizations and community organizations with cultural components throughout the city have an enormous impact on the lives of our citizens.

Our large cultural institutions are recognized around the world for excellence. They enrich the lives of our citizens, draw tourists, and contribute to the city's economy. Their continued support is essential to the health of the city.

Cultivation of audiences and an emphasis on arts appreciation is necessary to continuing cultural development.

Cultural activities should be accessible to the disabled, the elderly and low income people, both as audience and participants.

Cultural vitality is important to our economy and community development. The cultural sector employs thousands; cultural organizations bring identity to downtown and the neighborhoods; and our cultural diversity helps business maintain a quality workforce that wants to live in Chicago.

The public and private sectors have a responsibility to cultivate the development of the city's cultural life.

Chicago's culture is a collage of many cultures that sometimes stand separately, sometimes merge with each other. The heritage of Chicago's European Ethnic groups, Blacks, Hispanics, Asians, Native Americans and others make rich contributions to our cultural life.

City resources available for cultural support should be distributed on a fair and equitable basis, both among diverse cultures and between citywide and neighborhood-based cultural institutions.

Excellence in the arts is a continuing objective that underlies the entire Chicago Cultural Plan.

Culture comprises our common heritage and avenues of expression - the visual arts and crafts, humanities, anthropology, science and technology, performing arts, architecture and other means of expression - which people use to communicate their fundamental character and aspirations. Culture and the arts are essential to the quality of life. They help identify our place in the world and provide opportunities for creative expression. With this plan, Chicago states its commitment to providing citizens with these opportunities.
Return to Index

A New Beginning

The Chicago Cultural Plan is a comprehensive strategy for nourishing and cultivating culture in our city. It proposes to chart a new course by combining our many fine artistic and educational resources into a single voice that says "Culture matters."

The Chicago Cultural Plan is without precedent in its scope and the grassroots process by which it was crafted. It took shape from the recommendations and observations of thousands of Chicago citizens as well as hundreds of cultural, civic and community groups. It goes to the heart of the rationale for establishing the Department of Cultural Affairs, which grew out of a recommendation by Mayor Washington's 1983 Transition Team Report.

From the outset, our tenets were:

Culture and the arts are vital to the quality of our lives and should be so recognized in all aspects of municipal planning.

Cultural resources must be accessible and fairly distributed to all to ensure the continued and historically vital contributions of all segments of our diverse culture.

Culture is important to our economy by employing thousands of people. attracting new businesses, revitalizing neighborhoods and drawing hundreds of thousands of tourists to the city each year.

The Cultural Plan embraces these principles in a manner that celebrates the cultural diversity of the city.

The plan was one of the first projects undertaken by the new Department of Cultural Affairs. Under the direction of Michael C. Dorf, we began work in earnest after the City Council's unanimous approval of a resolution presented by Mayor Harold Washington in April 1985, to accept a two-year funding grant from the Chicago Community Trust for development of a plan.

This plan is not a finished document. In our rapidly changing urban environment, it must be viewed as a thoughtful beginning ... a dynamic plan that will continue to respond to fluctuating circumstances and ongoing funding requirements.

One very important task has already been achieved by the Plan ... and that is the very process. It has had a leavening effect on much of the cultural community. It has awakened some, reinvigorated others, and met head-on the doubts and skepticism from those who believe that too often their concerns are overlooked or just get lip service.

Perhaps most importantly, our meetings were attended not only by artists and arts administrators but also by many who for the first time talked about what art and culture could do for their community and their personal lives.

This summary of the plan will be supplemented with ongoing policy papers and expanded treatment of many concerns barely touched upon here. A major supplementary document will be available May 1, 1987.

Our city owes a debt of gratitude to Robert A. Hutchins, who chaired the Planning Committee, appointed from among the members of the Advisory Board by our esteemed Chair, Jessie A. Woods. In my long history, I have never experienced such commitment and wise generalship. And no project director has given of himself more than Mike Dorf and his staff in the difficult task of seeking a true synthesis of the unprecedented democratic process pursued here.

I must also salute and thank Nick Rabkin, Deputy Commissioner of Cultural Affairs; Madeline Rabb, Director of the Chicago Office of Fine Arts; Lois Weisberg, Director of the Mayor's Office of Special Events; and Kathryn Darrell, Director of the Office of Film and Entertainment Industries, for their ongoing, invaluable contributions.

Let us now join forces to transform this Plan into a living realization of our finest cultural aspirations.

by Fred Fine, Commissioner
Department of Cultural Affairs
Return to Index

Notes on Contributions by Michael C. Dorf, Director

We met in church basements in West Town and bank boardrooms in Albany Park. In union halls in South Chicago and park field houses in Austin. In libraries, movie houses, schools ... dance studios, community centers, theaters, museums ... and in every other place where people could come together. And they came. They came to South Shore in the middle of a blizzard and to Beverly in the midst of a summer thunderstorm. To Pilsen on a dark Wednesday night and to Lincoln Square on a sunny Saturday afternoon. Parents came, and kids came, and businessmen, and aldermen, and teachers, and librarians, and historians, and artists and artisans of every kind. They told us of ways to use the arts in the everyday life of the city. They told us of the joy the arts bring to the soul. We realized again and again the central role and image in the world at large. In all, thousands of Chicagoans participated in setting forth a vision for the cultural future of Chicago. They are the authors of the Chicago Cultural Plan.

-Michael C. Dorf, Director
Chicago Cultural Plan
Return to Index

Implementation

The Chicago Cultural Plan has been developed over the past two years through an intensive citywide effort to analyze the city's cultural needs and opportunities and to develop recommendations for action. All this work will have been in vain unless there is a concerted effort to turn this plan into action.

Some of the recommendations will require primarily the interest and efforts of city government and cultural organizations, while other recommendations will require additional funding.

A variety of players will carryout these recommendations: city government agencies, political leaders, community groups, cultural institutions, individual artists, private businesses, foundations, concerned citizens and others.

The overall responsibility for this mission, however, rests with the Department of Cultural Affairs.

The Advisory Board to the Department of Cultural Affairs is charged with overseeing the Department's implementation of the plan and setting future goals.

There will be an annual report to update the city on the progress of the Chicago Cultural Plan.
Return to Index


1. CULTURAL POLICY IN CITY GOVERNMENT

Department of Cultural Affairs
Tourism
Economic Development
The Park District
Public Art

The Department of Cultural Affairs

The Department of Cultural Affairs is the principal advocate and spokesperson in city government for cultural development and funding. As the umbrella agency for the Chicago Office of Fine Arts, the Mayor's Office of Special Events and the Office of Film and Entertainment Industries, it can be instrumental in coordinating and advocating cultural concerns. However, limitations in its resources and the current scope of its responsibilities restrict the Department's ability to mediate cultural concerns effectively. Such coordination could streamline and strengthen the impact of city support for cultural activities.
Return to Index

R E C O M M E N D A T I O N S

Strengthen the ability of the Department of Cultural Affairs to streamline city cultural programming among the various agencies and to act as an advocate for cultural concerns in such areas as codes, transportation, planning and education.

Confirm the role of the Department of Cultural Affairs in the subcabinets of Development and Community Services.

Encourage closer cooperation between the Department, the Illinois Arts Council and the Illinois Humanities Council.

Increase the staff and resources of the Department, including the Chicago Office of Fine Arts, the Mayor's Office of Special Events and the Office of Film and Entertainment Industries, enabling them to administer more effectively services such as technical assistance and grants programs.

Expand the Department's search for joint public-private partnerships, with foundations and corporate supporters, for example.
Return to Index

Tourism

An effective, energetic marketing of Chicago cultural activities can further increase the tremendous contribution that culture makes to the city's economy. The international reputation of Chicago as an arts center is a major factor in attracting conventions and hundreds of thousands of tourists. The richness of our cultural activities is an important economic resource to develop. Restaurants, hotels, transportation industries, parking garages and retail businesses all profit from a dynamic and well-marketed "Chicago Culture".
Return to Index

RECOMMENDATIONS

Assist and train cultural organizations to develop cooperative promotions to targeted tourism markets.

Create a task force to encourage and promote cultural tourism. The task force would consist of tourism agencies such as the Chicago Tourism Council and the Chicago Convention and Visitors Bureau, and other organization with a strong interest in tourism, such as the Illinois Restaurant Association and the League of Chicago Theaters.

Create and market a "Chicago Card," and all-purpose admission card that tourists could use at a variety of the city's attractions.

Support the Chicago Tourism Council's efforts to offer membership activities and expand its services in order to ensure a secure funding base.

Create an "Office of Cultural Exchange" within the Department of Cultural Affairs to facilitate national and international cultural tours.

Incorporate arts, architectural and humanities exhibits and performances into city-funded promotional and marketing programs.
Return to Index

Economic Development

Arts and culture are powerful tools for economic development. For example, a study commissioned by the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey stated that the arts and culture have a $5.6 billion annual impact on the economy of the New York City metropolitan area. In addition to the contribution that the arts industry, both commercial and not-for-profit, has on Chicago's economy, our reputation as an arts center is a large factor in attracting new business. We should more fully explore and promote the economic role of arts and culture in Chicago.
Return to Index

RECOMMENDATIONS

Prepare an "Economic Impact of Arts Study" for the region as a coordinated city interagency effort to demonstrate the large contribution that culture makes to our economy and to outline areas where that contribution can be increased.

Establish Cultural Enterprise Zones in which commercial and nonprofit cultural organizations have clustered office spaces, rehearsal and performance spaces, retail boutiques and galleries, along with studio and living spaces for individual artists. There would be initial tax incentives and subsidies to attract cultural organizations and private investors. Such zones have been successfully established in Seattle and Buffalo.

Create Cultural Incubator projects, to assist in the establishment and spin-off of cultural and arts businesses.

Maintain and coordinate a cultural development component in Chicago Works Together II: Chicago's development plan.

Explore new tools to maintain and expand Chicago's share of the feature film and television production industry in cooperation with the Illinois Film Office. These include the feasibility of a major new production soundstage, a revolving film financing fund and tax incentives.
Return to Index

The Park District

Since its founding in 1934, the Chicago Park District has sought to integrate the arts into the daily lives of Chicago residents. In addition to its extensive fieldhouse cultural facilities, the Park District hosts eight of the nation's most celebrated history, art and science cultural institutions.

While many of the fieldhouse cultural facilities have fallen into disuse and disrepair, the Chicago Park District has rekindled its desire to be a more active participant in our cultural community. It has recently added the Mexican Fine Arts Center and the South Shore Cultural Center to the roster of outstanding institutions on park land.
Return to Index

RECOMMENDATIONS

Institute close cooperation between the Department of Cultural Affairs and the Chicago Park District to achieve the objectives of the Cultural Plan.

Make Park District facilities more available to local cultural organizations and artists.

Encourage cooperative programming between the Park District and cultural and arts service organizations.

Further enhance cooperation between the Park District and the city's expanding festival programs directed by the Office of Special Events.

Strengthen and expand the financial support of cultural institutions on Park District property.
Return to Index

Public Art

Public art demonstrates a city's commitment to bring beauty to its citizen's everyday lives. Chicago already has an international reputation for outstanding public art. We will preserve and enlarge that reputation by reaffirming our commitment to commissioning new public art.
Return to Index

RECOMMENDATIONS

Strengthen the city's Percent for Art program by mandating that a full one percent of new construction or redevelopment costs of all public facilities be devoted to acquiring art for those facilities. To ensure benefits for the performing arts from this program, consider allocating up to fifty percent of the funds to a new trust for public performance facilities.

Extend the Percent for Art program to private development projects with public subsidies or financing.

Shift oversight of the Public Art Program from the Department of Public Works to the Department of Cultural Affairs so it can coordinate public art initiatives in all city departments (such as Department of Aviation, Board of Education, Park District and City Colleges).

Commission public art works for the O'Hare Airport expansion, the Southwest Rapid Transit route, the new public library, Wright Junior College and other public places over the next five years.

Expand active participation of neighborhood representatives in the selection of public art works, and include a healthy proportion of Chicago artists in the selections.

Lobby for the restoration of funding for public art in federally-assisted public transportation projects.
Return to Index

E-Mail us with your opinions!


We need your essays, editorials and additional suggestions on these issues. Which has the city acted on? Which have been ignored? What new ideas could be added to these? How can we help move Chicago toward a better standard of cultural excellence for ALL its citizens?

RESPOND TO umcac@art-teez.org


CITY WIDE COMMUNICATION AND COOPERATION

Communication About Programs and Resources

The one concern we heard again and again, in meetings held across the city, was the need to increase communication about the programs and resources we already have. Increased communication between the multitude of arts and cultural organizations can help them coordinate scheduling and promotion; alert them to additional resources available; and perhaps most importantly, allow them to work together to increase their overall impact in the city.

In addition, we must increase communication between arts groups and audiences. Too often the public is unaware of the wealth of available programs in the city. Many mechanisms for reaching broad audiences already exist, such as the branch system of the Chicago Public Library. We can more fully utilize such networks.
Return to Index

RECOMMENDATIONS

Support development of a citywide calendar of events.

Publish a "Cultural Directory" listing programs, services and funding available from city government and other public agencies.

Expand the scope and distribution of the Chicago Area "Technical Assistance Handbook" to provide a comprehensive directory of resources and services available to artists and arts organizations.

Increase ongoing communication between arts service organizations to expand information-sharing, scheduling and long-range planning. For example, the Cultural Collaborative Network and the Grant Park Cultural and Educational Community already bring groups together to share programming, promotional and collaborative activity.

Encourage radio and television to provide more cultural and public service announcements during regular listening and viewing hours.

Promote the works of local film and video makers through the Chicago Public Library system, by distributing their works on cassettes to the branch libraries.

Feature the works of Chicago artists and performers on the two municipal cable television stations, such as on the new "Music Alive" program.

Provide advertising space free of charge to cultural and arts organizations on CTA buses and trains.

Promote tour programs that increase awareness of the arts, culture and architecture.
Return to Index

Public Access to Cultural Programming

Much cultural programming is presented in Chicago without adequate audience support. And, many Chicagoans interested in participating in cultural activities either feel that the programming presented does not reflect their diverse cultural interests or are unaware of available opportunities. We must bring together these programs and audiences to the mutual benefit of each.
Return to Index

RECOMMENDATIONS

Expand neighborhood outreach programs by center city institutions, to attract larger audiences downtown and to bring appropriate exhibits and performances to the communities.

Use public access cable television channels to promote cultural activities as another method of attracting a broader audience.

Encourage the development of a citywide radio network for arts programming to bring cultural experiences to radio listeners at home and on the move.

Expand off-peak public transportation services on days when there are significant cultural activities or to sites where cultural events are occurring.
Return to Index

Community Arts Councils and Cultural Planning

Cultural planning in communities is sporadic. A group will assemble to organize an event and then disappear. And all too often, one group will offer a program that others in the community know nothing a bout. With no ventral coordination and communication, the overall effectiveness and impact of community cultural activities is greatly diminished, and community resources are not shared.

A number of community arts councils have been formed as a result of the Cultural Plan meetings. The Austin Arts Council and Near Northwest Arts Council are located in areas which have strong leadership and are already working to increase the visibility and positive benefits of cultural activities.
Return to Index

RECOMMENDATIONS

Encourage the organization of a network of community arts councils through assistance by the Department of Cultural Affairs. A community arts council, consisting of representatives from neighborhood arts groups, schools, parks, libraries and businesses, can help its community by coordination and promoting cultural activities.

Provide grants to develop and maintain community arts councils through the Department of Cultural Affairs.

Provide seed money and technical assistance through the Department of Cultural Affairs for planning in the neighborhoods.

Encourage arts councils to assist in the planning of neighborhood festivals.
Return to Index

E-Mail us with your opinions!


We need your essays, editorials and additional suggestions on these issues. Which has the city acted on? Which have been ignored? What new ideas could be added to these? How can we help move Chicago toward a better standard of cultural excellence for ALL its citizens?

RESPOND TO umcac@art-teez.org


FACILITIES

Living and Work Space for Artists and Arts Organizations

More than anything else, artists and arts groups need affordable and adequate living and work space. A "space of one's own" is an essential requirement for creativity. But financial resources are scarce, market forces hostile and antiquated city codes discourage efforts to acquire space. According to a 1983 study by the National Endowment for the Arts, Chicago was the only one of eight major cities surveyed with no policy of support for artists' space needs.
Return to Index

RECOMMENDATIONS

Better utilize existing arts spaces in park fieldhouses, schools and libraries. The Chicago Park District, for example, has 48 fieldhouse auditoriums with stages. Only 35 of them are in use for arts activities.

Make available to cultural organizations, on reasonable terms, vacant city-owned buildings for redevelopment.

Review and revise the city zoning code to permit artists to live and work in the same space.

Review and update building codes in cooperation with all affected interest groups to eliminate inconsistencies and conflicting interpretations.

Assess the real estate of artists (if owner occupied) and cultural and arts organizations at lower rates.
Return to Index

Community Cultural Centers

Every community also expressed a need for a "space of its own" for arts and cultural activities. A cultural center can bring an additional focus to the community by providing challenging programs for its youth, stimulating the local economy and offering new opportunities for local artists and arts groups.
Return to Index

RECOMMENDATIONS

Assist communities in determining the feasibility and planning of community cultural centers, as is being done by the Department of Cultural Affairs at the Hild Cultural Center in the Lincoln Square area.

Develop public private partnerships to create such centers where feasible.

Make city financing and other resources available to community cultural center redevelopment projects. Both the Victorian Mansion development and the Mexican Fine Arts Center have received public support of this kind.

Bring existing and new community cultural centers into a citywide network of centers.

Equip certain cultural enters -- in geographically diverse areas of the city -- with features such as climate controlled galleries, adequate stage area and security to permit them to host exhibits and performances from downtown institutions and touring groups.

Establish local control and possible ownership of community cultural centers. Communities would be responsible for programming and maintenance of centers, with support from public agencies.

Plan to include appropriate revenue-producing and fundraising activities in community cultural centers to help underwrite the costs of operations.
Return to Index

The Cultural Center

Under the Department of Cultural Affairs, in cooperation with the Chicago Public Library, the Cultural Center hosts 500 free programs and exhibits annually and has a fine reputation for thematic programming and showcasing of diverse local artists. But Cultural Center programming has been perceived as an addendum to the facility's primary role as a library.

There is a need for a full-fledged cultural center downtown that can highlight the very best of Chicago's creativity and diversity, give prominence to the variety of our European Ethnic, Hispanic, Asian, Native American and Black arts traditions, diversify cultural offerings in the Loop and become the city's star in Chicago's cultural galaxy. The Cultural Center has the potential to become such a facility.
Return to Index

RECOMMENDATIONS

Establish a joint committee to begin preliminary planning for the Cultural Center's future as the new public library becomes a reality. The committee should consist of representations from the Public Library, the Department of Cultural Affairs and other concerned parties.

Explore new funding sources for the further development and operation of the Cultural Center, including such current sources as the Library Fund, hotel/motel tax fund, private sector financing and other revenue options.

extend the number of hours the cultural Center is currently open to the public.

Increase promotion of Cultural Center activities.
Return to Index

E-Mail us with your opinions!


We need your essays, editorials and additional suggestions on these issues. Which has the city acted on? Which have been ignored? What new ideas could be added to these? How can we help move Chicago toward a better standard of cultural excellence for ALL its citizens?

RESPOND TO umcac@art-teez.org


TECHNICAL AND FINANCIAL RESOURCES

Funding for Individual Artists and Cultural Organizations

Financial support from both the public and private sector is crucial to the survival of a healthy arts and cultural community. Direct federal support for the public and private sector is crucial to the survival of a healthy arts and cultural community. Direct federal support for the arts and humanities is among the lowest of all developed countries. While the private sector has been generous in its support for some elements of our cultural life, that too must be expanded and broadened. The City of Chicago started to support Chicago's cultural life in a serious way only a few years ago. The growth of its support in the form of grants from the Department of Cultural Affairs has been great -- particularly to organizations outside the parameters of mainstream philanthropy. Far more, however, must be done to support all facets of the city's arts and cultural community, from individuals to community-based organizations to major and mid-sized institutions.
Return to Index

RECOMMENDATION

Increase the size and scope of the City Arts Grant program which provides both program and operating support for Chicago cultural institutions.

Increase the dollar amount of neighborhood Arts Program grants for individual artists.

Initiate a fellowship program for artists to pursue their won work and inaugurate a special artist awards program.

Provide grants-- such as the forthcoming Department of Cultural Affairs "Community Arts Assistance Program," funded with support from the Illinois Arts Council -- to organizations with limited or no access to conventional funding source grants.

Advocate increased support from the Illinois Arts Council for the Chicago Department of Cultural Affairs.

Create a revolving business loan fund for artists and cultural organizations, such as the forthcoming Department of Cultural Affairs "Cultural Facilities Development Loan Program" offered in cooperation with the Department of Economic Development.

Subsidize rent to artists in publicly owned buildings for both living and work space in exchange for community service projects performed by those artists.

Provide sweat equity projects in which artist tenets do post-construction work in exchange for ownership rights, similar to projects initiated in Minneapolis/St. Paul.

Strengthen the principles of peer selection and balanced distribution of grants to underscore equity and quality in all funding matters.
Return to Index

Technical and Materials Resource Centers for Artists and Not-for-Profit Cultural Groups

Many organizations need administrative support -- such as access to office equipment and supplies -- and help in obtaining costumes, props and other items specific to their discipline. A number of creative solutions have been developed by other cities with great success. Although in some cities these resource centers are funded and operated by the city, they could also be developed by the private sector or through a private-public partnership.
Return to Index

RECOMMENDATIONS

Create Administrative Support Centers where organizations can use office equipment and supplies, such as telephone answering services, copy machines and mail drops.

Create a Materials and Supply Center, where organizations can apply for items such as furniture, office and art supplies, as well as other materials donated by corporations, other arts organizations and individuals. new York's Department of Cultural Affairs has successfully run such a center for years.

Create a Costume Bank, similar to the ones in San Francisco and New York State, where theater groups can both store and rent costumes.

Create Technical Equipment Banks specific to various arts disciplines, so groups can both store and rent such equipment as lights, public address systems and audio/visual equipment.
Return to Index

Administrative Training and Services for Cultural Organizations and Individuals

The need for assistance in management, financial planning and administrative skills necessary to operate a cultural organization was expressed frequently during the Cultural Plan meetings. Both public and private initiatives exist to provide administrative assistance, such as the ongoing program operated by the Business Volunteers for the Arts and management training programs offered at various schools, universities and the Department of Cultural Affairs. These efforts need to be broadened and made available to a larger segment of the cultural community.
Return to Index

RECOMMENDATIONS

Increase management and administrative assistance programs for artists and cultural organization available at the Department of Cultural Affairs and through local colleges and universities.

Disseminate information more effectively on management and administrative seminars conducted by the Department of Cultural Affairs and other organizations.

Support and enlarge the pool of management consultants available to assist artists and cultural organizations.

Make management assistance programs offered by other city agencies available to artists, as many such programs are currently restricted to for-profit businesses.
Return to Index

E-Mail us with your opinions!


We need your essays, editorials and additional suggestions on these issues. Which has the city acted on? Which have been ignored? What new ideas could be added to these? How can we help move Chicago toward a better standard of cultural excellence for ALL its citizens?

RESPOND TO umcac@art-teez.org


ARTS AND EDUCATION

Elementary and Secondary Schools

The arts should be an integral part of schooling and reestablished as a priority in curricula. Viewed as an "add-on" to other subjects, the arts are too often the first program eliminated when school budgets are cut. Not only do we develop future artists and audiences in school arts programs, but children are exposed to creative learning and problem solving that expands their learning abilities.

The current Board of Education and General Superintendent have indicated not only a willingness but a desire to return the arts to education. The Department of Cultural Affairs should work cooperatively with the board and other non-public school systems to establish the arts as a component of basic education.
Return to Index

RECOMMENDATIONS

Offer a full program of arts in elementary and secondary education, including restoration of a two-year arts and music course requirement in secondary schools.

Advocate increased arts funding in education budgets.

Strengthen teacher education in the arts so that all teachers will have the ability to use the arts as a teaching tool.

Provide resources in the education budget to fund student access to a wide variety of cultural resources -- such as museums, performing and visual arts -- and to fund development of educational arts materials designed for the students.

Expand the Artist-in-Residence program of the Illinois Arts Council, the artist in school programs of Urban Gateways, Young Audiences, and other organizations through additional education and cultural appropriations. All students can benefit from hands-on creative instruction form professional artists.

Enrich and expand the Lighted Schoolhouse Programs, an program of after-school activities for youth, with quality arts programming.
Return to Index

Adult and Continuing Education

Arts education does not stop at the schoolhouse door, but remains an important source of knowledge and creativity throughout our lives. By restoring a complete program of arts in adult and continuing education, Chicago citizens have the opportunity to fulfill their potential for creative expression and development.
Return to Index

RECOMMENDATIONS

Include the full spectrum of arts disciplines in continuing education programs.

Use cultural enters, park buildings, libraries and other facilities for adult and continuing education.

Advocate increased appropriations for the arts within continuing education budgets.
Return to Index

E-Mail us with your opinions!


We need your essays, editorials and additional suggestions on these issues. Which has the city acted on? Which have been ignored? What new ideas could be added to these? How can we help move Chicago toward a better standard of cultural excellence for ALL its citizens?

RESPOND TO umcac@art-teez.org


PAYING FOR THE PLAN -- REVENUE OPTIONS

Revenue Options

The cultural life of our city needs and deserves an influx of new dollars to realize the Plan's recommendations. Some of the recommendations require little additional funding, but primarily involve the interest and effort of city departments and cultural organizations. Additional appropriations will be necessary, however, to implement many of the recommendations of the Cultural Plan. There are many innovative methods of financing recommended projects -- some of which are noted thought the plan -- as well as services and programs which are revenue producing.

There is also a pressing need for additional support from the private sector, through in-kind as well as monetary contributions. The city must use its leverage, through partnerships and other methods, to encourage increased corporate sponsorship of cultural activities.
Return to Index

RECOMMENDATIONS

Increase appropriations -- at the city, state and federal level -- for existing and new cultural programs.

Include cultural projects in general obligation bond issues.

Create special purpose bond issues for cultural institutions, which has been done successfully in New York City.

Broaden access to public bonding procedures for major cultural institutions, which has been done successfully in New York City.

Increase and earmark funds for joint cultural projects with other city departments, such as housing, jobs and public works programs.

encourage development of programs through which corporations contribute to cultural and not-for-profit activities, such as Minneapolis' "Five Percent Club" and other efforts currently under way in Chicago.

Eliminate the amusement tax on legitimate theater to stimulate commercial theater production, providing a broader tax base. Chicago currently has the highest such levy in the nations.

Increase Chicago's share of the state hotel/motel tax, given the contribution that Chicago cultural activities bring to the economic health of Illinois.

establish fee schedules for proposed city-operated materials and resource centers, similar to the fee schedules established in San Francisco.

Provide technical assistance to artists and cultural organizations, enabling them to move toward self-support.
Return to Index

E-Mail us with your opinions!


We need your essays, editorials and additional suggestions on these issues. Which has the city acted on? Which have been ignored? What new ideas could be added to these? How can we help move Chicago toward a better standard of cultural excellence for ALL its citizens?

RESPOND TO umcac@art-teez.org

A CULTURAL PLAN FOR THE PEOPLE OF CHICAGO:
THE GRASSROOTS CAMPAIGN

The Chicago Cultural Plan is based on the firm conviction that any blueprint for action is worthless unless the people affected are involved in the planning process. Although many cities have cultural plans, none has the scope and community input found in the Chicago Cultural Plan.

The Cultural Plan took shape from the careful distillation of hundreds of suggestions and concerns. it is a plan by and for the city, built solidly upon the needs and aspirations of Chicago citizens. it is not an attempt to impose one vision upon the city, but rather a plan that springs from the hearts and minds of the very people it seeks to serve.

Cultural Plan Director Michael Dorf and his staff spent 18 months meeting with disciplines, cultural institutions, city departments and planning groups. In the process, they held more than 300 meetings and involved a total of 10,000 participants, including the support and involvement of 36 aldermen.

Cultural Plan meetings were held in 65 Chicago community areas as established by the 1980 census report. Prior to each meeting, area leaders met to set an agenda. Notices were sent to members of local arts groups and community organizations and were posted on community bulletin boards to alert area residents to the meetings. Public service announcements and paid advertising were also used as appropriate.

Three citywide meetings were held with Latino, Asian and Native American artist respectively, as well as a roundtable meeting co-sponsored by Urban Traditions and the Illinois Consultation on Ethnicity.

A special meeting was held for representatives of center city and major downtown cultural institutions. Return to Index

E-Mail us with your opinion!

RESPOND TO umcac@art-teez.org

8) NEW SUGGESTIONS BY GRASS-ROOTS

Three ideas that will cost the city little or nothing but will make Chicago more of an attraction to tourists

1) Give artists their full 1st Amendment rights of free speech in Chicago. Since the Bill of Rights was written to apply to individuals at the birth of our nation, and only later did courts interpret those rights to belong to corporations like the Chicago Tribune and the Chicago Suntimes, we individual citizens should have at least the same free speech rights as those two newspapers enjoy. There is a reason there are no art scenes in Chicago. There are no art scenes because artists are run off the streets in Chicago by a licensing scheme that lumps artists in with incense sellers and outlaws them from the parks and all the good locations to sell their speech. Yet, corporations with their expensive lawyers have their freedoms and sell their speech in the parks and the public ways. In New York where the streets are more crowded the artists are able to sell their speech on the public ways. Not in Chicago. Free the artists and stand by us and Chicago will change in many ways for the better.

2) Eliminate Chicago's "Itinerant Merchant" tax on artists selling in art fairs held in the city. This tax makes little money for the city but places a heavy burden on artists trying to support their creative activities.

3) Define stretches of Lake Front Park land as a markets for Chicago's artists (must live in the city and create art/crafts sold themselves) to sell their art and crafts seven days a week from May - September. This could be run by a non-profit agency and classes for youth and adults could be offered on the spot when the weather permits. Create jam stages for musicians and poets in city parks and encourage artists to work on Chicago's streets. Encourage Musicians to use the El and invite artists and musicians to animate the Loop.

Review and responce to an initial proposal by Trish Shepard on how to proceed to accomplish this goal. What are your thoughts on this? Please review and comment.

Response from Mr. David Bosca of Americans for the Arts

4) Make it legal again for artists to paint the rocks on the Lake Front as was the case in the 60's. Is there someone who can write us on the history of this activity in Chicago and its demise?

5) Review the Chicago Department of Cultural Affairs' report on Revisiting the Chicago Cultural Plan. This is a extensive opinion of in favor of major art institutions with contributions from the Loop Art Activity and Centralized Control Committee (LAACCC). We encourage discussion and debate on the merits of each new suggestion and will form pages linked to each suggestion as we receive responses to them.
Return to Index

RESPOND TO umcac@art-teez.org

Click here for Free Website Graphics.


Uptown Multi-Cultural Art Center (UM-CAC). E-mail UM-CAC at umcac@art-teez.org Ph.773/561-7676


urban planning SPW Art | ART-ACT Art | Introduction | Art Contest | Web School | Free Graphics
Web Lessons | Lakefront Artists Market | Artists Links | Artists Resources | Help Us